Mar5Written by:Nathan Greeno
3/5/2010 6:25 AM 
The glacial pace of higher education may be its
undoing. Two days ago I had a discussion with another higher education
service provider who was pulling up stakes in the higher education
market. His reason: "I can't continue with the glacier pace of
higher education decision-making."
The business-to-consumer business model is thriving within higher education,
but only the sectors that are willing to be very innovative, responsive and
quite frankly, quick to decide. This often means higher education is in
need of embracing support services through a business-to-business model. Speed
and accuracy are mission-critical to survival. This corresponds with the
past thirty years of literature on the ever-increasing rate of change. It
is unfortunate that the vast majority of higher education is stuck in the
quagmire of poor decision matrixes and very slow response time to its market of
consumers.
It comes back to two primary concerns. First, there is great need for
higher education leadership with significant business acumen. Second, this
leadership must be willing to step out of the historically "safe"
zone of higher education and take reasonably intelligent risks. This type
of leadership is often not well liked in higher education circles by faculty
and even staff. This leader will short cut the committee on committee
traditional process by calling on internal leadership to make decisions that
will change the climate. Those who have been historically safe within
higher education, such as faculty with tenure and administrators with thirty
years in the same position, will be called to account and retained based upon
performance. This performance will be measured against how each player
contributes to the overall success of the institution -- not just on how his or
her individual fiefdom is surviving.
The days of the glacier pace of higher education have come to a natural
end. For some this is just the beginning of the end, but nevertheless an
end eventually. The external environment is changing all too
quickly and making institutions that are unwilling to change in pace, irrelevant.
As I write this blog I wonder how it might be read. Is it negative and
depressing? I don't think so. It is calling out in plain sight the
greatest transformation event in higher education history. Higher
education is changing from being centered on itself, to a central focus on the
individuals it serves. This is indeed a wonderful change for those who
will embrace it fully.
Nathan
Copyright ©2010 Nathan Greeno
Tags: